
The end result may require a compromise between the level of detail and the computational effort.ĭifferent timesteps can be specified for 1D and 2D domains largely removing this constraint. For stability reasons, the timestep for computation is normally controlled by the minimum channel length. In general, the finer the resolution the more accurate the model, but the longer the computing time. The adequacy of the 1D domains is primarily dependent on the network representation adopted. Alternatively, a 1D network may be imported or dynamically linked to an external database. Surveys of key hydraulic controls such as levees / embankments (3D breaklines), culverts, bridges, etc.ġD link-node networks are developed in XPSWMM with the graphic toolset. Peak levels should be attached as attributes to the calibration points. ocean water levels, catchment inflows, rainfall, evaporation, etc).Ĭalibration data locations as points in a GIS layer. If bed resistance varies over the model, geo-corrected aerial photography or other GIS layer from which material (land-use) zones are digitized for setting Manning’s n values.īoundary conditions (e.g. The vertical accuracy is dependent on the typical depths of inundation in key areas. However, for large scale models ± 0.2m is preferred, whilst for fine-scale urban models < ± 0.1m is recommended.

The vertical accuracy depends on the modeling objectives and budget constraints. The minimum data requirements for setting up a 2D/1D hydraulic model are:Ī DTM with sufficient resolution and accuracy to depict the topography of all flowpaths and storage areas in the 2D domain(s). General Considerations for building a 2D Model Data Requirements
